B R E A K I N G THE MOULD
Reformers have come and gone, but taboo against Dalits have remained.
By
Chandra Bhan Prasad
Coerced by Brahmin-piloted history, Dalits are
demographically segregated and situated at the outskirt on the varna-village-society.
Should they remain so forever? Condemned by the Brahmin scripted social value system, none should dine with
Dalits, leave alone marrying them. Should that value system remain so forever?
Minced by Brahmin predestined political power system, Dalits can't be
leaders
of the society, leave alone being rulers. Should that system remain so
forever? To borrow a term from Kerner Commission's report dealing with US'
race riots, Dalits are "separate and unequal". Should Dalits remain
so forever?
What if, irrespective of social or political conditioning or compulsions, the
Brahmin himself reaches out to the Dalit? What if, irrespective of social or political conditions or compulsions, the
Brahmin agrees to be led by the Dalit? What if, irrespective of social or political conditions or compulsions, the
Brahmin touches the feet of the Dalit in reverence? What if, irrespective of social or political conditions, the Brahmin sings
songs in glory of Dalits?
All these seem to have happened in the just-concluded UP election. Did all the
Brahmins do so, one might ask? Not really. But, even if a section of them did
so, it's one of the greatest social revolutions witnessed in India. So when a Brahmin in a village begins dinning with a Dalit, will the reputation
of that family go down, or go up? And what if one fourth of Brahmins of that
village begins dining with the Dalits?
Will non-Brahmins of that village begin boycotting that family where Brahmins
are going? Or, they too once invited, will begin dining with Dalits? One need
not be a great sociologist to find the answer. The question we must ponder over is: Will that kind of social situation be a
"revolution" or "counter-revolution"?
Despite all the hatred directed against the Brahmins for legitimate reasons
though, and despite the decline they have undergone due to their own social
scripts, they still remain a positive point of reference. The allegedly
intelligence deficient shudra understood Brahmin power better than the
Dalits.
In the land of the anti-Brahmin movement, temples headed by Brahmins have
become a cottage industry. The devotees are often those who fought against
Brahmins. Should a Shankaracharya visit Karunanidhi's house - the symbol of shudra/OBC
upsurge - the entire family will fall on his feet.
In north India
too, Lalu Yadav and Mulayam Singh symbols of shudra/OBC upsurge, are
more Brahmin-feet friendly than even empowered Brahmins. Even the Muslim and
Christian clergy respect Brahmins. Whenever it comes to social legitimacy, all castes and religious blocks, seek
blessings from Brahmins. But, they keep instigating Dalits to fight the
Brahmins.
Today, Brahmins are touching Mayawatiji's feet. The culturally
traumatised elite Brahmins attack Mayawati for practising this new brand of
Brahminism. Arguably, touching feet is one of the ugliest methods of reverence. Hitherto,
only Brahmins or the Dwijas were entitled for this form of reverence. Now, the
form remains but the subjects and objects changing.
The Brahmins are now touching Dalits' feet. Is this changed social scenario a
new Brahminism or counter-Brahminism? Will the self-esteem of the Dalit whose
feet is being touched by the Brahmin go down? Or, will he become a celebrity? For ages, Dalits have suffered social taboo.
These Brahmin authored taboo can be eradicated only if Brahmins themselves
reverse them and begin dining with Dalits.
Reformers have come and gone, but taboo against Dalits have remained.
Through her Dalit-Brahmin thesis Mayawati has unleashed a new social
revolution
in the cow belt. The Brahmin has fallen in line all other castes will
follow. Not that the cow belt has turned into any special social
democracy zone, but
the ice has been broken.
Forwarded by Ronki Ram (Dr.), Panjab University, Chandigarh (India), Cell:+91 987 286 1290 Poted on May 14, 2007 |